<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SharePoint &amp; Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.e2oh.com/2008/05/18/sharepoint-web-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.e2oh.com/2008/05/18/sharepoint-web-20/</link>
	<description>Investigations Into Enterprise 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:01:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SharePoint &#38; Web 2.0 Part Deux</title>
		<link>http://www.e2oh.com/2008/05/18/sharepoint-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>SharePoint &#38; Web 2.0 Part Deux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 22:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e2oh.com/2008/05/18/sharepoint-web-20/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>[...] it&#8217;s always a good idea to keep abreast of what SharePoint offers when it comes to E2.0. I blogged before about how Microsoft is avoiding rolling content creation capabilities into the platform to preserve [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it&#8217;s always a good idea to keep abreast of what SharePoint offers when it comes to E2.0. I blogged before about how Microsoft is avoiding rolling content creation capabilities into the platform to preserve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Nash</title>
		<link>http://www.e2oh.com/2008/05/18/sharepoint-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e2oh.com/2008/05/18/sharepoint-web-20/#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Gotta love MS. As a side note I tend to think that people either get too bogged down in the rich formatting capabilities of MS Word, or have no idea they are even there. I would rather people not have the option to think about formatting, and instead focus on producing quality content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta love MS. As a side note I tend to think that people either get too bogged down in the rich formatting capabilities of MS Word, or have no idea they are even there. I would rather people not have the option to think about formatting, and instead focus on producing quality content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SharePoint &#38; Web 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.e2oh.com/2008/05/18/sharepoint-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SharePoint &#38; Web 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 11:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e2oh.com/2008/05/18/sharepoint-web-20/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>[...] Cow&#8217;s Blog: Science, technology and the internet. wrote an interesting post today on SharePoint &amp; Web 2.0Here&#8217;s a quick excerptThey suggest two pieces of client software: Microsoft Word 2007 or. Windows Live Writer. While both of these are great programs, and good ways to&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cow&#8217;s Blog: Science, technology and the internet. wrote an interesting post today on SharePoint &#38; Web 2.0Here&#8217;s a quick excerptThey suggest two pieces of client software: Microsoft Word 2007 or. Windows Live Writer. While both of these are great programs, and good ways to&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

