<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stop Talking, Start Listening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/19/stop-talking-start-listening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/19/stop-talking-start-listening/</link>
	<description>Investigations Into Enterprise 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:40:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/19/stop-talking-start-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/19/stop-talking-start-listening/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>whats up with the comments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whats up with the comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/19/stop-talking-start-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/19/stop-talking-start-listening/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure i agree with Haqiue&#039;s premise.  I notice that given the ease and abundance of information (both well thought through, and poorly), the necessity of creating a more coherent, shorter, highly communicable &quot;brand&quot; is higher than ever.  Given the bandwidth we have, if the material isn&#039;t clearly articulate, then i (perhaps just me?) generally skip it.  If its too salesy, or too longwinded - who has time.  It&#039;s, particularly if there is enough information available that i can go and find a clearly articulated message from _someone else_!  There is clearly a balance between customer communication, and communication by press release.  The new &quot;two-way communication&quot; paradigm is still a transfer of information and brand that must be highly managed - if anything moreso than before since you need to both control the outgoing message, and then capture and respond to any customer responses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure i agree with Haqiue&#8217;s premise.  I notice that given the ease and abundance of information (both well thought through, and poorly), the necessity of creating a more coherent, shorter, highly communicable &#8220;brand&#8221; is higher than ever.  Given the bandwidth we have, if the material isn&#8217;t clearly articulate, then i (perhaps just me?) generally skip it.  If its too salesy, or too longwinded &#8211; who has time.  It&#8217;s, particularly if there is enough information available that i can go and find a clearly articulated message from _someone else_!  There is clearly a balance between customer communication, and communication by press release.  The new &#8220;two-way communication&#8221; paradigm is still a transfer of information and brand that must be highly managed &#8211; if anything moreso than before since you need to both control the outgoing message, and then capture and respond to any customer responses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
