<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly of Corporate Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/</link>
	<description>Investigations Into Enterprise 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:01:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exockkich</title>
		<link>http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Exockkich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/#comment-396</guid>
		<description>mm. interesting :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mm. interesting <img src='http://www.e2oh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transparent Development – Part Deux</title>
		<link>http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Transparent Development – Part Deux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 22:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>[...] between recent press on Wal-Mart’s buyer blogging, my post about transparent development, and Jay’s post about sound corporate blogging. And henceforth the following idea came to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] between recent press on Wal-Mart’s buyer blogging, my post about transparent development, and Jay’s post about sound corporate blogging. And henceforth the following idea came to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Iceland Export Bananas?</title>
		<link>http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Iceland Export Bananas?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] determine someone&#8217;s capability is to see it for yourself, open and public on the Internet. To Jay&#8217;s point about corporate blogging, companies who expose their capabilities (read: people) to the greater community will reap [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] determine someone&#8217;s capability is to see it for yourself, open and public on the Internet. To Jay&#8217;s point about corporate blogging, companies who expose their capabilities (read: people) to the greater community will reap [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Hariani</title>
		<link>http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Hariani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 04:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>@Paul - Thanks, I&#039;ll check out the podcast. Good to know that the issues and polices around corporate blogging are being tackled head on.

@Nate - Absolutely. As a client, I&#039;d be much more likely to pay top dollar for a resource that was publically recognized as a leader in her field (as much as I&#039;d like to take account rep&#039;s word for it) :)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul &#8211; Thanks, I&#8217;ll check out the podcast. Good to know that the issues and polices around corporate blogging are being tackled head on.</p>
<p>@Nate &#8211; Absolutely. As a client, I&#8217;d be much more likely to pay top dollar for a resource that was publically recognized as a leader in her field (as much as I&#8217;d like to take account rep&#8217;s word for it) <img src='http://www.e2oh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Nash</title>
		<link>http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>@Jay - Totally agree (shocker). Corporate blogs should not be a press release by a different name.  And as far as the lawyers are concerned, as a consumer I would rather buy products from a company who fires employees who fly off the handle in a public forum, that wonder what moron is hiding behind the kid gloves of lawyerly redlining. 

Expose your workforce to the larger room. Especially in consulting. If no one wants to pay for your star blogger, perhaps he shouldn&#039;t be billed at 5k/day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jay &#8211; Totally agree (shocker). Corporate blogs should not be a press release by a different name.  And as far as the lawyers are concerned, as a consumer I would rather buy products from a company who fires employees who fly off the handle in a public forum, that wonder what moron is hiding behind the kid gloves of lawyerly redlining. </p>
<p>Expose your workforce to the larger room. Especially in consulting. If no one wants to pay for your star blogger, perhaps he shouldn&#8217;t be billed at 5k/day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Hariani</title>
		<link>http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Hariani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>@e2.0h lawyer - Carr has an interesting perspective - but I disagree - dialoguing with the marketplace is more then ideology. A company&#039;s ability to do it, and do it well, will become increasingly demanded by customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@e2.0h lawyer &#8211; Carr has an interesting perspective &#8211; but I disagree &#8211; dialoguing with the marketplace is more then ideology. A company&#8217;s ability to do it, and do it well, will become increasingly demanded by customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Dunay</title>
		<link>http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Dunay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 03:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Good post Jay

I wanted to point out a recent podcast I did with Andy Sernovitz and Sean O&#039;Driscoll on the Blog Council which was created to discuss issues for Corporate blogs

you can check out the podcast here

http://buzzmarketingfortech.blogspot.com/2008/02/blogcouncilorg-solving-challenges-of.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Jay</p>
<p>I wanted to point out a recent podcast I did with Andy Sernovitz and Sean O&#8217;Driscoll on the Blog Council which was created to discuss issues for Corporate blogs</p>
<p>you can check out the podcast here</p>
<p><a href="http://buzzmarketingfortech.blogspot.com/2008/02/blogcouncilorg-solving-challenges-of.html" rel="nofollow">http://buzzmarketingfortech.blogspot.com/2008/02/blogcouncilorg-solving-challenges-of.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e2.0h lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>e2.0h lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e2oh.com/2008/02/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-corporate-blogging/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>As a lawyer, I see the positives to corporate blogging, but what I see more clearly is the liability.  As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2006/03/seven_rules_for.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nicholas Carr has stated&lt;/a&gt; the potential risks might outway the potential gains.  I think there needs to be some degree of top down control on corporate blogging.   Personally, if I have built a company from the ground up, I do not want my company&#039;s image tarnished by an off-the-wall employee who feels that this right to free speech is more important than my company&#039;s image.  This is especially true in the context of his corporate-sponsored blog.  I like&#039;s Carr&#039;s last piece of advice: &quot;Call in the lawyers. I hate to say it, but if you&#039;re allowing your employees to blog on your dime, you&#039;re liable for what they write. Better safe than sued.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a lawyer, I see the positives to corporate blogging, but what I see more clearly is the liability.  As <a href="http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2006/03/seven_rules_for.php" rel="nofollow">Nicholas Carr has stated</a> the potential risks might outway the potential gains.  I think there needs to be some degree of top down control on corporate blogging.   Personally, if I have built a company from the ground up, I do not want my company&#8217;s image tarnished by an off-the-wall employee who feels that this right to free speech is more important than my company&#8217;s image.  This is especially true in the context of his corporate-sponsored blog.  I like&#8217;s Carr&#8217;s last piece of advice: &#8220;Call in the lawyers. I hate to say it, but if you&#8217;re allowing your employees to blog on your dime, you&#8217;re liable for what they write. Better safe than sued.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

